Database Managers
kilaniIf you're a user that has long been interested in adding to the database and editing it as well, please join! If you're a user that has been interested in doing this but is too shy to start and has some questions, please join! All users who have interest in helping our database grow and flourish are welcome into the club, no matter how experienced they are.
--under construction, but please feel welcome--
--under construction, but please feel welcome--
Forums35
Related Articles1
9,094 hits • 21 comments
Comments1,135 comments
So it’s OK to add Kadokawa Taiwan Media again as the manufacture? I can add the note on the further info box.
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
今度は僕が見せてやる見たことのない景色を
AS long as the goods item is of japanese origin then it should be fine.
So it’s OK to add Kadokawa Taiwan Media again as the manufacture? I can add the note on the further info box.
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
今度は僕が見せてやる見たことのない景色を
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
今度は僕が見せてやる見たことのない景色を
If the origin is Japanese then the goods is allowed. It could be that someone just got confused regarding the rules or thought it was a Taiwanese origin. I can't help you much more than that.
Your text does not make it clear if it was a media item or a goods item but here goes;
Media entries are only allowed if they've a Japanese origin and are a Japanese release (i.e. published in Japan).
If it's goods then only a japanese origin is needed.
Kadokawa Taiwan is not treated as Kadokawa Japan and therefore is a non-Japanese manufacturer. This applies to all outside of Japan branches of Japanese companies. Hence why some Yamato US and Bandai US keeps getting removed everytime someone tries to add them.
I'm not familiar with the origin itself so I can't say why it would've been treated as non-Japanese.It was for goods. A pass case. It’s the Taiwan release of a BL series series of Japanese origin. I was confused as to why it was removed since we have Taiwan manga companies on the board with goods from different BL series. The BL series is released by Libre however they don’t have an overseas office so it was licensed to Kadokawa Taiwan. We have non Japanese complains as well in the board like grestceastern entertainment which has items from anime series so isn’t this treated as the same thing since the origin of the BL comic is Japanese?
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
今度は僕が見せてやる見たことのない景色を
The comic is not allowed due to being a non-Japanese release (i.e. it's not published in Japan). All media entries must have both a Japanese origin and be a japanese release.
KiraYamato44 (12 days ago) #44873570snip
Your text does not make it clear if it was a media item or a goods item but here goes;
Media entries are only allowed if they've a Japanese origin and are a Japanese release (i.e. published in Japan).
If it's goods then only a japanese origin is needed.
Kadokawa Taiwan is not treated as Kadokawa Japan and therefore is a non-Japanese manufacturer. This applies to all outside of Japan branches of Japanese companies. Hence why some Yamato US and Bandai US keeps getting removed everytime someone tries to add them.
I'm not familiar with the origin itself so I can't say why it would've been treated as non-Japanese.
I was wondering if a MOD can answer a quick question for me. I recently added a bonus with the Taiwan release of an artbook (they are releasing the title under their company since it’s the Taiwan release of libres title). It was deleted under the non Japanese company / Non Japanese origin, but the company is Kadokawa media (Taiwan) it’s Kadokawa’s publishing branch in Taiwan. We have other Taiwan publishers on the database listed w their goods, so I’m confused as to why this item was deleted. The origin is Hidoku Shinaide which is of Japanese origin.
Thank you in advance.
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
今度は僕が見せてやる見たことのない景色を
It's about a comic book that I would like to add here:
Origin and character designs: Japanese
Publisher: USA-based
Artist and writer: European
I guess not allowed, although the origin and characters are Japanese?
Ooh I see, thank you for clarifying!
ITEM #350679
ITEM #342274
ITEM #342273
ITEM #342270
ITEM #324092
ITEM #143663
Based on other Substitute browse.v4.php?v... merchandise in the database, it looks like those items shouldn't have any character listed at all (if no Pokemon is present). Instead, the identifying feature of the merchandise should be under Version which states Substitute instead (like this item for example: ITEM #430298).
If I remember correctly, those are listed as elfuun because they are marketed as such. I think elfuun was a popular character in the anime for a while and substitute was it's signature move or something like that and therefore a lot of substitute merchandise was sold as elfuun. Any item that's only marketed as substitute should not be under that Pokémon though.
ITEM #350679
ITEM #342274
ITEM #342273
ITEM #342270
ITEM #324092
ITEM #143663
Based on other Substitute browse.v4.php?v... merchandise in the database, it looks like those items shouldn't have any character listed at all (if no Pokemon is present). Instead, the identifying feature of the merchandise should be under Version which states Substitute instead (like this item for example: ITEM #430298).